You are here:

Planned treatment abroad

Comparing the S2 (or E112) and Article 56

There are some major differences between the two application routes. In conjunction with your local health commissioner you should decide which route is most suitable:

Payment conditions

  • S2 or E112: the UK covers the cost of treatment. However, the patient may need to pay a contribution towards healthcare costs which they may be able to seek reimbursement for when they are back in the UK if they are not able to do so in the other country.
  • Article 56: treated as if you’re a member of your home member state, therefore you will have to pay treatment costs up front and seek reimbursement from your local NHS health commissioner.

 

Treating sector

  • S2 or E112: since this is based on agreements between governments it is only valid for state sector treatment.
  • Article 56: can be state or private sector treatment as the NHS will be directly reimbursing you the fees you have paid.

 

What happens next

  • S2 or E112: the appropriate paperwork from your local commissioner should be sent to the Overseas Healthcare Team in Newcastle and they will consider issue of the E112 form and will post it to you.You will need to present the form to the hospital authorities abroad on admission. For more information and advice phone 0191 218 1999.

 

Limit to amount that will be paid

  • S2 or E112: no limit to how much will be paid to the treating institution, even if the cost is more than the treatment would have cost at home. The amount paid will match the treating country’s contribution, and may extend to reimbursing you a portion of your contribution.
  • Article 56: amount reimbursed to patient is limited to what it would have cost to treat them under their local health care system. If the cost of foreign treatment is less than what treatment would cost under the NHS, the patient will not get the excess. 

Reimbursements

  • S2 or E112: patient only pays any co-payments (this is where, in some countries, a patient is required to pay a certain percentage of state-provided treatment).The patient may then be able to seek reimbursement for this cost when they are back in the UK if they are not able to do so in the other country.
  • Article 56: patient pays total costs upfront and is reimbursed up to what the treatment would have cost at home. If the cost of foreign treatment is less than what treatment would cost under the NHS the patient will not get the excess.

Comments are personal views. Any information they give has not been checked and may not be accurate.

simonzldn said on 27 September 2011

I had had a Hip Operation in a clinic in Tunisia. I was on the NHS Hip Surgery list for years ..while on holidays in Tunisia, things got worse and I had to see a Doctor there...I was offered an emergency surgery. I took the chance and did it. Plus, I had to stay for a further rehabilitation process that lasted nearly 3/4 weeks before I was flown back to the UK on a wheelchair of course. I paid for all the medical and rehabilitiation fees theremyself (around £6.000 to 8.000 in total). I was never told If of these NHS refunding courses by my GP on my return. Was I entitled to claim for a reimbursement of all or part of these medical costs. Could anyone help or assist on this matter...?

Thank you...I am Brain Injuries Survivor and could hardly deal with my personal daily affairs then. I have since improved (Memory function wise) thanks to the support of Headway House Association who provides me with regular support and other medical and physiotherapy and psychotherapy care.

I will appreciate if someone could enlighten me on these Medical Costs and Reimbursements matter.

Simonzldn

Report this content as offensive or unsuitable

hartley said on 06 November 2010

Do patients need to have arranged treatment abroad before leaving the UK, so that they can claim under Article 56?

Report this content as offensive or unsuitable

Rob Dickman DH said on 11 June 2010

The Article 56 route is the subject of Regulations, Secretary of State's Directions and Guidance which were released to the NHS last month. Link:

http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_115256

In some cases, prior authorisation may be required before a patient accesses treatment in another EEA State. However, PCTs cannot insist on a patient obtaining prior authorisation where this is not justified (the regulations set out the circumstances where prior authorisation may be applied). Hence, there may well be occasions where patients return from an EEA country where they have incurred treatment costs and then seek to claim reimbursement from the PCT - less any applicable NHS charges. The principal considerations are whether there is a proven clinical need for the treatment and whether the patient would have been entitled to the same or similar treatment on the NHS.

Report this content as offensive or unsuitable

WorcsCommissioner said on 26 May 2010

Can you please confirm whether patients wishing to receive re-imbursement using the Article 56 route, need to have had this decision considered and endorsed by a UK (local) clinician in charge of the person's ongoing care?

Our main concern is that patients may go into the EU to receive surgery which their local PCT does not support. The result being that the patient, if not informed of this before the decision to travel for treatment is made, then runs the risk of not being funded for that treatment.

Report this content as offensive or unsuitable

Last reviewed: 19/04/2010

Next review due: 18/04/2012