When a local authority assesses the person you're looking after (to establish whether they must contribute to the cost of their residential care) it will look at both their income and savings (also known as capital).
The local authority can only consider the income and capital of the person receiving care. If the person receiving care is in a couple, the local authority may take into account income or savings to which the person receiving care has a legal entitlement, such as a share in a bank account. This can apply even if the income and savings are not in their own name.
This may mean that the local authority will ask for information about the finances of the partner of the person you're looking after. If the person receiving care at home wants to dispute their partner's income or savings being taken into account they can use the complaints procedure.
Capital
The upper capital limit is £23,250 and the lower limit is £14,250. If capital is above the upper limit, the care home resident won't normally receive any assistance with the fees. If capital is between £14,250 and £23,250, £1 a week for every £250 is taken into account as income. For example, if a resident has £15,250 in capital they'll be treated as if they had an extra £4 of income a week.
Most forms of capital are taken into account but some can be disregarded. For example:
- the value of personal possessions,
- payments from charities, and
- payments from personal injury trust funds.
If savings are held in a joint account they are presumed to be owned in equal shares by each partner of a married couple or civil partnership.
Property
The value of the property of the person you care for will be disregarded for the first 12 weeks of their stay in a care home.
After that, the way the value of a property is treated depends on whether the person is a temporary or permanent resident of a care home, or whether there's still someone else living in the property after they go into residential care.
If the stay is temporary, or turns out to be temporary even if that was not at first intended, the value of the property is disregarded. If a temporary stay becomes permanent, the 12-week period for which property is disregarded starts from the date it is decided that their care is permanent.
The value of the property will also be disregarded if it's occupied by the resident’s partner. This also applies if the property is occupied by a relative of the resident who is aged 60 or over, or incapacitated, or a child of the resident who is under 18.
Social services can use its discretion to disregard the value of a property in which a third party continues to live.
If the resident owns a property jointly with someone else, they won't be asked to sell the property to pay for their fees. The resident will be assessed as owning a share of the property, but the market value of their share is likely to be low or nil as the property would be shared with someone else.
Example
Simon cared for his mother and lived in her property until she went into residential care. Simon is 48 and has physical health problems so can only work part time. He was financially supported by his mother before she went into a care home.
Simon can say that the value of the property in which he continues to live should be disregarded because of his incapacity. He can ask the local authority to use its discretion in this case.
Income
Most income is taken into account but amounts of certain benefits can be disregarded. For example:
Personal expenses allowance
A care home resident is entitled to a personal expenses allowance. This is an amount intended to ensure residents have some money to buy, for example, personal toiletries and small presents. It is currently £22.30 a week. It is taken into account when income is calculated.
A local authority has discretion to allow a larger personal expenses allowance. This is relevant if the care home resident has a dependant child or is a temporary resident and needs to meet the costs of their own property. If the person you're looking after would experience hardship if the allowance was not increased, they should complain to social services.